Print Email Download Reference This Send to Kindle Reddit This
submit to reddit

Boycotts Strikes And Lockouts History Essay

Boycotts, Strikes, and Lockouts can be broadly classified under the category of Labours Disputes. While a labour dispute is any disagreement relating to terms, tenure, or situation of employment. Whether individual or combined in character, labour disputes takes place between two parties in employee-employer relations, in which employees exercise their labour rights and fulfil their employment duties. Profit-oriented organisational administration strategies often result in abuses of power and authority which consequently leads to widespread violations of worker rights and a high level of discontent among ordinary workers and the end result is different types of labour disputes like boycotts and strikes.

The term Boycott can be defined as “To abstain from or act together in abstaining from using, buying, or dealing with as an expression of protest or disfavour or as a means of coercion.” Or “to engage in a concerted refusal to have dealings with (as a store, business, or organization) usually to express disapproval or to force acceptance of certain conditions.” The term originated after Charles C. Boycott (1832–97), English estate manager in Ireland, against whom nonviolent coercive tactics were used in 1880.

The term Strike has various different meanings in English language but when related to a work stoppage in an organisation it can be defined as “a concerted stopping of work or withdrawal of workers' services, as to compel an employer to accede to workers demands or in protest against terms or conditions imposed by an employer.” Or “a concerted work stoppage, interruption, or slowdown by a body of workers to enforce compliance with demands made on an employer.”

The term Lockout can be defined as “the temporary closing of a business or the refusal by an employer to allow employees to come to work until they accept the employer's terms.” Or “The withholding of work from employees and closing down of a workplace by an employer during a labour dispute which is also known as “shutout”.

History

Boycott:

The act of boycott was started in 1980 from an occurrence of Englishman and former British soldier named Charles C. Boycott, Boycott was the land agent of the Earl of Erne in County Mayo, Ireland. The earl was one of the truant landowners who as an assemblage held large part of the land in Ireland. Boycott was selected in the fall of 1880 to be the trial case for a new strategy advocated by Charles Parnell, an Irish politician who sought after land reform. Any landlord who would not charge lesser rents or any occupant who took over the farm of an expelled tenant would be given the absolute cold shoulder by Parnell's clique. Boycott refused to charge lower rents and turned out his tenants. At this point members of Parnell's Irish Land League stepped in, and Boycott and his family found themselves out-of-the-way—without servants, farmhands, facility in stores, or post deliverance. Boycott's name was hastily adopted as the phrase for this behaviour, not just in England but in other parts of Europe as France, Holland, Germany, and Russia and later on became a global term.

Strike:

The strike scheme has a very extensive history. Towards the end of the 20th dynasty, under Pharaoh Ramses III in ancient Egypt on 14 November 1152 BC, the artisans of the Royal Necropolis at Deir el-Medina planned the foremost known strike or workers' revolution in recorded history. The occasion was reported in detail on a papyrus at the time, which has been conserved, and is presently situated at Turin. The strike is narrated by John Romer in Ancient Lives: The story of the Pharaohs' Tombmakers

The exercise of the English word "strike" initially came into appeareance in the year 1768, when sailors, supported the demonstrations in London, "struck" or detached the topgallant sails of commercial ships at docks, thus crippling the ships. Official publications had characteristically used the more unbiased words like "work stoppage" or "industrial dispute".

Mexico was the first country in the history world which gave legal rights to strikes in the year 1917.

Lockouts:

The first industrial lockout cannot be marked but the Dublin Lockout was the one which had a significant role in history of lock outs. The dispute lasted from 26th August, 1913 to 18th January, 1914. The dispute was among 20,000 workers and 300 employers in the capital city of, Dublin in Ireland. The prominent factors of the lock out were a high amount of poverty, high infant mortality rate and high rate of diseases due to lack of health care and cramped living conditions in the city and tuberculosis being a major diseases in it. Poverty was a major factor because of the reason that there were lack of opportunities for unskilled workers and they had to compete within themselves and had to work for lowest wages before the mark of trade unionism in Ireland.

-Cartoon showing the depth of ill feeling caused by the lockout

Causes

Strikes

The causes of strike are of course very varied; taking on all the matters connecting to circumstances that may take place between employer’s causes and the ones who are employed. Familiarity to subject shows, that the enormous volume of disputes speak about the questions related to remuneration, a much minor percentage to hours of work, and the float to a huge amount of diverse questions, like providing job to people or classes of people repellent to the strikers on the basis that they are not from their union, or have worked against its interests, or by reason that they do not have " right " to the particular profession on which they are working, either on description of not having gone through the acknowledged training or of belonging to another line of work.

Lockouts:

A lockout may occur for a number of reasons. When only part of a trade union votes to strike, the employer may decide to lockout so as to put pressure on the workers union to reduce the number of members who are not willing to work. For example, if a pre planned strike severely affects the working of non-striking workers, the employer may decide to declare a lockout until the workers plan to end the strike.

An employer may also impose a lockout in order to avoid the slowdowns or irrational work-stoppages.

Sometimes, predominantly in the United States, a lockout happens when the union rejects the organization’s last offer at negotiation and wants to return to work in the same terms of employment which existed under the contract which has been expired. In such cases, the lockout is declared in order to pressurize the workers to accept the terms of the last offer made by the company.

Steps to be undertaken to Deal with Strikes

All most all strikes are organized by unions and are somewhat expected; they classically take place after the agreement has been expired. However, all strikes are not called by union organizations a few strikes have been called in an endeavor to force employers to acknowledge unions. Other strikes may be unplanned proceedings by effective people. Spontaneous strikes are known as "wildcat strikes"; they are often organized due to serious (often life-threatening) safety hazards in the place of work rather than remuneration or hour disputes.

Whatsoever may be the grounds of strike, employers are commonly forced to take actions to put a stop to them, tone down the effect, or to emasculate strikes when they do become apparent.

Strike preparation

Companies which manufacture goods for selling will regularly enlarge the number of inventories aforementioned to a strike. Paid workers may be called upon to take the position of strikers, which may necessitate improvement guidance. If the company has numerous locations, employees may be redeployed to run into the requirements of condensed staff members.

Companies may also take out strike indemnity earlier to a projected strike, to help make up for the fatalities which the strike would bring about or trigger.

Strike breaking

Some companies bargain with the union during the period of a strike; other companies may look upon a strike as an endeavor or a chance to get rid of the union. This is sometimes fulfilled by the introduction of replacement workers, strikebreakers or "scabs". Traditionally, strike breaking has often been regarded like the same with union busting. It is also known as 'Black legging.' The word gets origin from early 20th century, and it became popular from the Russian socialist revolution.

Union busting

One technique or approach of inhibiting a strike is removal, abolition or exclusion of the union that may instigate it, which is occasionally accomplished all the way through union busting. Union busting programs may be held by Human Resources consultants, and may make use of the services of labor spies, or asset protection services. Comparable services may be occupied during attempts to trounce organizing drives. A modern example of a union buster is The Burke Group.

Lockout

Another counteract to a strike is a lockout, the outward appearance of work obstacle or barrier in which an employer does not allow employees to work at the workplace. Every Two out of the three employers who were involved in the strike of Caravan park grocery workers in 2003-2004 locked out their workers. It was reaction to a strike which was against the third partner of the employer bargaining group. Lockouts are, legal with a few exceptions, under the United States labor law.

Violence

In the past, some employers have attempted to shatter union strikes by power, strength and force. One of the most prominent and notorious examples of this occurred during the Homestead Strike of 1892. Entrepreneur Henry Clay Frick sent personal security agents from the Pinkerton National Detective Agency to end the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers strike at a Homestead, Pennsylvania steel mill. Two strikers were killed, 12 injured, alongside two Pinkertons killed and 11 wounded. In the consequences and repercussion, Frick was shot twice in the neck and then stabbed two times by Alexander Berkman, surviving the attack.

The story goes as below:

In July 1892 there occurred a most serious affair between the Carnegie Steel Company and its employees at what is known as the Homestead Works, near Pittsburg, mounting out of a incongruity in the preceding month in regard to remuneration.

. The parties were incapable to come to an accord, and the company stopped its workings on the 30th of June and discharged its men. Only a diminutive portion of the men were affected by the planned modification of earnings. The bigger section of them, who were members of the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers, were not affected at all, nor was the huge force of workers, some three thousand in number, who were not members of that union. The company refused to acknowledge the association as an organization, or to hold any discussion with its representatives. Upon the breakdown to arrive at an adjustment of the wage complexity the company planned to operate its workings by the service of non-union men. The men, who could not secure recognition, refused to agree to the reduced rates of wages, and also came to the fortitude that they would resist the company in every attempt to secure non-union workers.

The instant cause of the struggle which subsequently took place at Homestead was the approach of a body of Pinkerton's detectives, the Pinkerton’s were armed with Winchesters, but they were thankful to land and ascend the embankment single file, and so were soon driven back to the boats, suffering severely from the fire of the strikers. Many efforts were made to land, but the position of the men they were attacking, behind their breastworks of steel rails and billets, was very strong, and from this place of safe refuge the detectives were subjected to a galling fire. This opening battle took place on the 5th of July, about four o'clock in the morning, and was constant in a unfocused way during the day.

It was renewed the following day. Brass ten-pound cannon had been held by the strikers, and planted so as to control the barges moored at the banks of the river. A little before nine o'clock a bombardment commenced, the cannon being turned on the boats, and the firing was kept up for several hours. The boats were confined by heavy steel plates inside, so efforts were made to fire them. Hose was procured and oil sprayed on the decks and sides, and at the same time many barrels of oil were emptied into the river higher than the mooring place, the reason being to set it ablaze and then allow it to float against the boats. Under these collective movements the Pinkertons were obliged to throw out a flag of ceasefire, but it was not recognized by the strikers. The officers of the Amalgamated Association, though, interfered, and a surrender of the detectives was agreed. It was arranged that they should be safely protected, under condition that they left their arms and ammunition; and, having no choice, they accepted the terms. Seven had been killed and twenty or thirty wounded. On the 10th of July, after several days' communication with the state officials, the governor sent the entire force of the militia of the state to Homestead. On the 12th the troops arrived, the town was placed under martial law, and order was restored. There had been much looting, clubbing and stoning, and as the detectives, after surrender, passed through the streets they were treated with great verbal abuse. Eleven workmen and spectators were killed in the fights.

Congress made an inquiry of this strike, but no governmental action was ever taken. Some indictments were made and lawsuits ensued. The mills were slowly supplied with new people, but the strike was not declared off until the 10th of November 1892. The Homestead strike must be looked upon as the bitterest labour war in the United States. It was unsuccessful.

A review of data for strikes in UK during the year 2009

Dataset

      Series

Periods

BBFW

BLUU

BLUT

F8Y6

F8Y2

F8Y5

F8XZ

F8Y8

F8Y4

F8Y7

F8Y3

2009 01

7

7

5

..

7

..

0

..

3

..

4

2009 02

15

7

8

..

14

..

1

..

4

..

3

2009 03

3

13

2

..

1

..

2

..

4

..

9

2009 04

2

6

1

..

2

..

1

..

2

..

4

2009 05

4

13

3

..

3

..

1

..

6

..

7

2009 06

47

16

16

..

38

..

9

..

6

..

10

2009 07

24

10

28

..

1

..

24

..

5

..

5

2009 08

36

9

39

..

1

..

36

..

6

..

3

2009 09

57

12

48

..

4

..

53

..

6

..

6

Name of unit

Description

Unit measured in

BBWF

Working days Lost

Thousand

BLUU

Stoppages in progress

One

BLUT

Workers involved

Thousand

F8Y6

Working days lost in the Private Sector – Annual

Thousand

F8Y2

Working days lost in the Private Sector - Monthly

Thousand

F8Y5

Working days lost in the Public Sector – Annual

Thousand

F8XZ

Working days lost in the Public Sector – Monthly

Thousand

F8Y8

Stoppages in progress in the Private Sector - Annual

One

F8Y4

Stoppages in progress in the Private Sector - Monthly

One

F8Y7

Stoppages in progress in the Public Sector - Annual

One

F8Y3

Stoppages in progress in the Public Sector - Monthly

One

Conclusion

Boycotts, Strikes and Lockouts are important weapons for employees and employers. Both of these are used by them when no further negotiations are possible and the outcome is nil. Both of this weapon have been authorised in almost all the countries, so as to safeguard the interest of both by the governments of those countries.

Being the part of an HR first of all it’s our responsibility to strengthen the relations between the employers and employees. The HR team is the one who needs to draw down the policies regarding the working hours, safety at the work place, remuneration, and other motivational components so as to give maximum job satisfaction to the employees and reduce the levels of grievances, and thus blocking the paths for major industrial disputes which can tarnish the image of the organisation.

During the occurrence of a strike the HR team can use various methods of dealing with strikes like strike preparation, union busting, strike breaking and so on but the best way is to negotiate and resolve the disputes or a third party intervention where the third party may help the employers and employees to come at terms, but methods like violence shouldn’t be used as it is illegal and dangerous method. If all of these tools aren’t useful then the last option to safeguard the employer’s interest would be to opt for a lockout.

Print Email Download Reference This Send to Kindle Reddit This

Share This Essay

To share this essay on Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, or Google+ just click on the buttons below:

Request Removal

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please click on the link below to request removal:

Request the removal of this essay.


More from UK Essays