Print Email Download Reference This Send to Kindle Reddit This
submit to reddit

Healthcare Reforms In England Issues

The healthcare service in England attempts to improve the overall healthcare service have been ongoing through some of the most radical reforms since its inception as a comprehensive public service since 1948. The noticeable need of a free healthcare service was essential after the state of the country due to the world war. Once the NHS was established it saw many reforms led by diverse types of governments at different times. Despite the scale of the reforms they have preserved their core principle of “A free service at the point of delivery” 1 till this very day. Even though they have adopted the core principle they still face huge challenges; as demands and costs are still rising, the entirety of the service is increasingly being looked at. This paper looks at the reforms the NHS has been through and analyses each reform in the light of Efficiency: the capability of the NHS, whether the reform made the NHS more competent, Equity: bringing fairness and equal right for the patients as well as the staff, Quality: whether adapting the reforms improved the patient’s ability to acquire different types of healthcare services without any predicament and obtain high-quality healthcare services.

Methodology

This paper was conjured up by the use of reports published by NHS Publications website. Journals and studies on NHS reform via the scientific database PubMed were also utilized. To gain info on the theories the NHS was formed on, management theory books by Max Weber, Henri Fayol and Frederic Winslow Taylor were used.

Results/Discussion

Each reform improvised the NHS in many ways, in relation to Efficiency the NHS since its inception has seen major investments and new hospitals built, employment of up to date technology allowing more patients to be seen within an applicable time and budgets been controlled efficiently with the aim to reduce costs each year allowing the NHS to run efficiently. In terms of Equity after the publication of the Black report, the NHS has improved on giving equal opportunities to its minor ethnic groups of staff. Also the equal treatment of patients regardless of their social class has been improved since the Blair era. The NHS in terms of quality has become one of the world leading healthcare providers. Measuring their services against standards set by the NHS ensured that they are meeting the set standards. The major investment in staff in 2000 saw a number of lives saved in the past 10 years. The NHS has met quality standards that are accepted by its patients and valued as a first class service.

Conclusion

Overall the NHS has seen many reforms which have lead to the NHS becoming a world class service. Since the reforms in the 1960’s to the latest plans of the new coalition government the NHS has improved immensely in terms of efficiency, equity and quality and the future also looks bright for the NHS.

Introduction:

Healthcare service in England was launched in 1948 with an aim “to provide universal healthcare to its citizens which is free at the point of use and available to everyone based on need, not ability to pay” 1. “The NHS was established after World War II where the country needed a stable healthcare service” 2. The initial idea was that no-one should be deterred from seeking health services by a lack of resources and the founder Aneurin Bevan: Minster of Health stated “A free service at the point of delivery” 3. Till this day they have been providing free healthcare service to the citizens of England.

In 1948 Sir William Beveridge, a British Economist and a Social Reformer conferred details of his radical plans for economic and social reform in post-war Britain. Sir William proposed major healthcare service changes on the basis that the country needed “the abolition of want before the enjoyment of comfort and suggested a scheme where every kind of medical treatment would be available for everybody”. 1,3

Pre NHS

There has been some form of state-funded provision of health and social care in England prior to the NHS for 400 years.4 Prior to a health system being formed, attaining healthcare service in Britain in the 1930s and 1940s was difficult. Life expectancy was very low and thousands of people died of infectious diseases like pneumonia, meningitis, tuberculosis, diphtheria, and polio each year.4 The poor never had access to medical treatment and they relied instead on dubious and sometimes dangerous home remedies. Either that or they relied on doctors who gave their services free to the poor patients. The Hospitals charged for treatment and although the poor were reimbursed and before they received treatment they had to pay.4 Figure 1 shows the life expectancy that has changed since the NHS was introduced.

Figure 1.Life expectancy changes since 1840 5

The need for free healthcare was widely recognised, but it was impossible to achieve without the support or resources of the government. A study showed that expert’s believed and have written extensively on the reasons of why a health service was needed.6 These included:

The appearance of a view that health care was essential, not something just imparted erratically by charity

The drastic effects of the war that made it possible to have a massive change of the healthcare service being provided, rather than just an incremental alteration

As younger members of the country were becoming increasingly educated in the medical profession they had a view of things could be handle in a more efficient way.

The hospitals having financial problems, funds not sufficing.6

Having looked at the reasons to why a health service was needed the government made plans and core principles were established: 6

Regardless of persons status they were eligible for health care, even people temporarily residing or visiting the country.  People could be referred to any hospital.

The healthcare service was financed almost 100% from central taxation 

Care was entirely free at the point of use6

The main achievement was that the poor who in the past went without medical treatment now had access to free healthcare.6

NHS today and NHS employment

NHS is one of the largest organisations in the world with an annual budget of around £80 billion employing more than 1.7 million people and treating over one million people every 36 hours.7 In general, healthcare service being provided within England to every single citizen is a difficult commission to undertake and consequently the system needs efficient health personnel’s to help run the system economically.

Today the view of the healthcare service in England is that the NHS is a world leader and provides first class service that other countries envy. “Countries all over the world seek to learn from the comprehensive system of general practice, and its role as the medical home for patients, providing continuity of care and coordination”.8 Other countries look at English NHS system and use them as a guideline to run their healthcare system.

NHS Structure

The healthcare service in England has been run in a structural way with the Secretary of state and Department of Health controlling the overall NHS in England. The secretary of state for health has the responsibility of reporting to the prime minister. There are10 Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs) in England which are controlled by the Department of Health, they oversee all the activities within the NHS and the SHAs supervise all the NHS trusts in its area. Primary care plays a major role in community healthcare and is central to the NHS. Services under NHS trust (Secondary Care) include Hospitals, Mental Health services, Learning disability services and Ambulances. The overall structure of the NHS is shown below in Figure 2. 9 Although this is the current NHS structure with the new government in power, changes are to follow.

Figure.2 overall structure of the Healthcare system in England 5http://www.ohe.org/cnt/txt/61/1/NHS_structure.gif

NHS Reforms

Since its inception in 1948 the NHS has seen many reforms in terms of managing the way they provide healthcare service. The DoH has a lot of control and influence the major decisions taken in the reforms.

The overall expectations of Healthcare service in England are of a high calibre, which requisites high-quality management capacity.10 In the 1980’s and early 1990’s prominence was on recuperating management. The recent focal point has been on development of leadership within NHS. With the new government, new ideas and plans will be imposed to see improvements in quality of healthcare being provided, cut down on costs making it more efficient and in terms of equity provide equal service to everyone. Table 1 briefly enlists the reforms that have taken place since its inception in 1948.

Table.1 Reforms in the NHS: 1948-2010

Period the reform’s were in place

Reform and theory of Management

1948- 1960

Managers as diplomats

1960’s

Scientific Management and the Salmon report

1970’s

Classical Management, Systems Approaches and the 1974 Reorganization

1980’s

The Griffiths report and Managerialism

1990’s

Working for Patients and the Internal Market

2000

The NHS Plan (DOH 2000) and the ‘Third Way’.

2010

NHS White Paper 2010: Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS

Healthcare service and Reforms in other Developed Countries

Healthcare reforms within developed countries can be analyzed in order to compare whether the healthcare services in England have been successful in its bid to ensure efficiency, equity and quality.

Attempts to handle reforms of the healthcare system in the European countries have been an ongoing process for 30 years. Although the reforms have taken throughout the 30 years in different ways, their main emphasis has been on improving the cost-effectiveness of the healthcare service. In the early 1980’s the EU countries were looking at cost containment. The feature in the 1990’s was to endorse efficiency in terms of introducing competition and markets in the healthcare system. Since 2000 the focus has switched to effectiveness; promoting various notions of healthcare in terms of quality.11

Over the course of the 20th century the countries of Europe have established significant success in improving the healthcare service for their citizens. However they still face challenges in the form of restraining costs, improving quality and providing universal healthcare access, these have put the European healthcare services under immense pressure.11

Looking at another OECD: USA, A report on ‘A review of health care reform in the United States’ assessed whether the USA have been successful in providing healthcare. The findings showed that United States spent more per capita on health care than any other OECD country, yet its health outcomes lagged behind other countries.12 This shows they are struggling with efficiency issues and are still countering challenges in providing quality healthcare service that is expected from the citizens of the USA. Especially in the last few years Healthcare reform has been a major activity of the federal government, in order to revolutionize and develop the service overall. The 3 goals of optimizing cost, access and quality still remain a challenge within the healthcare society in the U.S.12 They concluded that USA still faced many challenges in running the national healthcare service, a key challenge they face is the utter complexity of the system, with its numerous public and private providers.12

Another OECD country reviewed in terms of healthcare service being provided and the reforms that have taken place is China. A report from on ‘From a national, centrally planned health system to a system based on the market: lessons from China’ concluded: ‘China is the country that has undergone the highest number of health care reforms. Since 1978, China saw many reforms and they also followed the way as the EU countries, with the healthcare system starting from governmental, centrally planned and a collective system to ending up as a heavily market influenced system. Now, thirty years later, the Chinese government openly concede that the reforms were unsuccessful and seek innovative and fresh directions.’13 This illustrates that China is also in a healthcare crisis and looking to implement different strategies in order to gain control of China’s Healthcare system.

Having reviewed the healthcare service being endowed in these developed countries, it demonstrates that they are all on an identical level as the healthcare service being provided in England and all face similar challenges. All these developed countries are looking to develop the countries overall healthcare service in terms of efficiency, equity and quality.

NHS Plan 2000 and the future of NHS

Since the last reform: The NHS plan 2000 14, a lot has transformed in terms of funding and operating the healthcare system in England. Especially with the new coalition government’s idea of cutting budgets it is a difficult time the NHS is going through and will necessitate a lot of expertise and world class management to get through today’s financial and economical predicament.

An additional indication that will be taken into deliberation is the election of the new plans set out in the NHS White Paper 2010. As the new coalition government has come into authority there have been huge changes to overall budgets for the public services and this possibly will have a consequence on the way the NHS operates in England. 15 The reforms have encompassed a significant impact on the organisation and deliverance of health care service in England. Wide array of transformations have been pioneered in an attempt to ensure the NHS is ‘managed’ more resourcefully and effectively. This report will examine whether these reforms have on the whole improved the healthcare system in England in terms of efficiency, equity and quality and if the public’s requirements have been convened.

Aims:

To examine the healthcare reforms in England since its inception and to assess whether these reforms have improved factors of efficiency, equity and quality in providing healthcare.

Objectives:

To review the reforms in the NHS since its inception in 1948

To examine whether these reforms improved efficiency, equity and quality of healthcare

To assess the key features of healthcare reforms proposed by the current government and their implications on the NHS

To put forward plans for the future of the NHS

Methodology:

A number of sources were consulted to conjure up this paper and examine the healthcare reforms in the NHS. Scientific search engines and databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct (Date accessed 20/10/10) were used to gain literature reviews but results from Google Scholar and Science Direct were dismissed as they were too vague and irrelevant to this topic. With PubMed following keywords were inserted ‘Healthcare’, ‘Reforms’ and ‘England’. The data was also set from 1948 to 2010 when searching for reports as this would set the inclusion criteria. The reports and journals since 1948, when the NHS was established were used. Even though history before 1948 was looked at for study purposes, reports before NHS establishment; these were regarded as the exclusion criteria as reports weren’t looked at prior to 1948. Healthcare service within Britain was looked at in general but for the results of this report, the inclusion criteria was healthcare service in England as it just looked at the healthcare service being provided within England. The exclusion criterion was healthcare service in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

For the first part of the report, the introduction: where the report looked at the history of the NHS. The resources used included looking at general management books looking at management theories. The classical theories of Max Weber, Frederic Taylor and Henri Fayol were the backbone of the NHS and that is why these were used.

Another source to produce this paper was the Department of health (http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/index.htm) where the publications and reports about the NHS in general were looked at. This paper used a lot of publications produced by the Department of health and the NHS publications as these sources are reliable; these were seen as good foundation to work from. One of the main publications used was ‘The NHS white paper: Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS’ presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health, this was a key entity in writing up this paper.

As the paper didn’t contract with experiments and clinical trials, it didn’t look at a lot of statistics; the majority of its content was obtained from qualitative data.

Results/ Discussion

Having carried out the required literature searches and reading journals, reports and Department of Health Publications, results were gathered and have been shown below with the discussion of the key topics. The results look at each reform taken place in the NHS and then goes onto analyse the plans set by the new government. Having looked at the reforms and the new plans the paper than talks about efficiency, equity and quality related to each reform.

Reforms in the healthcare service in England

The healthcare service in the UK has undergone a number of reforms since its inception in 1948. Prior to 1948, healthcare service was provided in England but due to the increasing pressures for efficiency and quality in health services it lead to these developments and reforms in healthcare being provided. A more overtly management-oriented approach to the healthcare service delivery was adopted based on classical management theories to gain more control of the healthcare service in England. 16,17

Classical theories and Scientific Management: 1960’s

The NHS was based on the classical theories of Frederic Winslow Taylor, Henri Fayol and Max Weber. 16-19

Table 1: Frederic Winslow Taylor’s four main scientific management principles.

Replacing rule-of-work thumb methods with methods based on a scientific of the tasks

Scientifically train each individual rather than leave them to train themselves

Cooperate with each worker to ensure that the scientific method is being followed

Divide workload equally between managers and staff

Table 2: Henri Fayol’s Modern Operational Management approach.

Division of work- Specialization for efficiency

Authority & Responsibility- Both are related, the latter arising from the former.

Discipline-Requires good superiors at all levels

Unity of Command- Employee should receive orders from one superior only

Unity of Direction- Each group of activities with the same objective must have one head and one plan

Subordination of individual to general interest- When the two are found to differ, management must reconcile them

Remuneration- Should be fair and satisfactory

Centralization- Extent to which authority is concentrated or dispersed

Scalar chain/line of authority- Needs to be sensible, clear and understood

Order : Right thing/person in the right place

Equity- Equal opportunity for everyone

Stability of tenure- Unnecessary turnover is both the cause and effect of bad management

Initiative- Thinking out and execution of a plan

Thinking out and execution of a plan

Table 3. Max Weber’s Bureaucratic approach.

Power-Ability to get things done, often by the use of threats or sanctions

Authority- Ability to get things done because of the position that justified someone in terms of legitimacy

Formal approach

Hierarchical authority

Extensive roles and procedures- Uniformity of decisions and actions

Job description- Clear-cut division of labour and High level of specialization

Discipline

These classical theories contributed a lot to the healthcare service in England and still do to this day.16-19 The classical writers thought of the NHS in terms of purpose and formal structure. They created a formal structure on which the NHS could run on. They also looked at job design, scientific selection and development of workers. The classical theories generally serve as a backbone to the present day NHS management.

Although the classical theories made a big contribution to the healthcare service in England it had its limitations and wasn’t the most effective way. One drawback was that it wasn’t evidence based; it didn’t look at the way staff did their tasks and didn’t look at the well being of staff, the human and social aspects of work. It just treated them like machines. The theories didn’t look at motivating the staff and developing them in their own interests, had they done this staff’s work quality would’ve enhanced thus providing an efficient service to patients and overall improve the quality of healthcare service in England. Overall the classical theories were too concrete and fully based on rules and procedures. In terms of efficiency the theories bought a set way of running the healthcare service in England. Once the NHS was established it introduced equity as well as healthcare service was now available to anyone. The NHS was just established and with these set in place in the 1960’s the quality of service would improve from now with further reforms to come.

Salmon Report: 1960’s

One of the first reforms took place since the NHS was established was in the 1960’s. The Salmon Report bought findings and changes which included that workload should be equally distributed between managers and practitioners.20 The NHS would also get rid of matrons and replace them with a hierarchy of nurse managers. The introduction of several additional layers to the management hierarchy; in order to improve efficiency in operating the NHS. This lead to responsibility being equally distributed and the service met its aims and objectives more efficiently. Another change was that nurse managers would contribute to the overall management of the service through the medium of consensus management teams and thus improve efficiency and quality within the NHS. Having nurse managers lead to them taking control of set responsibilities and helped in general running of tasks at ward level leading to an improvement in general quality in the healthcare service being provided.

1974 Reorganization: 1970’s

The aim of this reform was to attain greater integration of the healthcare service in order to provide more stability and increase efficiency. The reorganisation also introduced more central control in order to: 21

ensure policies were implemented

improve accountability

encourage delegation

develop democratic decision-making process

These changes lead to a more structured way for managers to follow and enhance the quality of the healthcare service. By the mid 1970’s quality was improving but there were still concerns of equity in the NHS. There were still clear differences of health sufferers in terms of social class; figures showed that people in lower social classes more likely suffered from diseases. “There were several possible explanations for these inequalities.

Natural and social selection. This would depend on the view that people who are fittest are most likely to succeed in society, and classes reflect this degree of selection.

Poverty leads to ill health, through nutrition, housing and environment.

Cultural and behavioural explanations. There are differences in the diet and fitness of different social classes, and in certain habits like smoking”. 22,23

Overall in the 1970’s the quality of healthcare service was still improving, equity issues were still a concern and in terms of efficiency they were recuperating the NHS.

The Griffiths Report: 1980’s

This reform was a major point in NHS history, the Griffiths Report identified problems such as the healthcare service was institutionally inactive and that the local health authorities were filled with directives without being given any clear procedures to follow.24 The Griffiths report stated that changes were difficult to achieve but gave recommendations to improve the NHS. It introduced a more formal and modern way of management. It gave increased participation for managers in setting and controlling budgets. The report also gave greater emphasis on cost awareness in order to improve efficiency. A Clear and quick decision-making process was introduced to improve quality of service provided to patients. The managers in local authorities were given a more clearly defined direction and the overall staffs were better informed.24

The Internal Market & Working For Patients: 1990’s

Another reform in the 1990’s took place, this bought a new dimension to the NHS; large publicly-owned hospitals could opt to become self-managed trusts. This meant that health services could be bought by private investors i.e. patients themselves thus allowing them to take control of the way they want the service. Even large GP’s could become ‘fund holders’ and be both purchasers and providers of care.25 This reform lead to introduction of greater flexibility thus allowing more effective matching of patients needs and care. Money ‘followed the patients’ through the system of purchasing and providing of healthcare service, this led to equity being improved as patients had more selection of services. This reform led to higher competition in providing quality healthcare service, the costs decreased and the general quality increased.

The NHS Plan 2000

The NHS Plan 2000 made key findings : the NHS is a 1940s system operating in the 21st century and that it lacked of national standards. It also said that there were barriers between staff and providing services. There were a lack of clear guidelines and the NHS structure has over-centralization.14 Plans to diminish problems and propose new plans such as introducing Modern Matrons’ to improve the management of services, a strong leader with clinical experience and with clear authority at ward level, improve efficiency by setting standards and controlling resources these were there aims.14,26 The figure below shows the comparison of the 1948 and the new NHS model outlining the key differences.

nhs 1940 & 2000.png

Figure.4 the key difference between the 1948 model and The NHS Plan 2000 model 14

The NHS Plan 2000: Achievements

This reform set out specific targets which were achieved in order to improve efficiency, equity and quality of healthcare service in England:

Over 100 new hospitals by 2010 and 500 new one-stop primary care centres

Clean wards and better hospital food

7,000 extra beds in hospitals

Over 3,000 GP premises modernized

Modern IT systems in every hospital and GP surgery

7,500 more consultants and 2,000 more GPs

20,000 extra nurses and 6,500 extra therapists

Childcare support for NHS staff with 100 on-site nurseries.26

These targets were achieved in 2008 and it led to the improvement of efficiency as the number of GP’s and consultants employed were increased. The modernisation of technology and IT systems led to quality of service being improved as high investment in high quality equipment made the NHS one of the world’s top quality service. Since 2000 NHS has improved the overall service and met its objectives.

NHS Implications: Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS

With the new coalition government coming into election another set of reforms have been proposed as they hope to improve the overall healthcare service in England. The main aims and objectives to improve the healthcare service are varied and very detailed but to summarise it these are the points covered:15

“Increase health spending in real terms in each year of this Parliament” 15and also that there “goal is an NHS which achieves results that are amongst the best in the world” 15. However the government will uphold the foundation that the NHS was formed on; “a comprehensive service, available to all, free at the point of use and based on clinical need, not the ability to pay” 15.

The government than goes into detail of what they arrange to initiate to make an efficient healthcare service: acknowledge the fact that patients come first and therefore will give them greater choice and control. An example of this is that a patient will be able to choose any GP practice, consultant, and choice of treatment consequently improving equity of the service.

The government endeavours to develop the healthcare outcomes: set objectives such as “reduce mortality and morbidity, increase safety, and improve patient experience and outcomes for all” 15. By doing this they are ensuring they are driving efficiency and improving the service. In order to achieve the objectives that the government sets, the ability for service providers to have more autonomy, responsibility and accountability will be a means to achieving efficient results.

A big change will be the establishment of a NHS Commissioning Board. The board will be accountable for making sure health outcomes are achieved, allocate resources and have the lead on quality improvement and to tackle inequalities that exist in the NHS. Overall the reforms in the NHS Paper 2010 will provide the NHS with greater incentives to increase efficiency, equity and quality.

Efficiency

The healthcare system in England has on the whole perceived a huge improvement in terms of efficiency since its inception in 1948. A system has been established where it endows with one of the best services in the world but there are still room for improvements.

An analysis of the services gives evidence such as the NHS building 100 new hospitals since 2000, therefore improving the efficiency and allowing better access for patients. 27 Even though there continue to be a lack of quality and accessibility to services across the country. The patients haven’t been able to impose enough pressure to force improvements. The NHS need to give patients more control over the health services they have access to improve efficiency. In 2008 investment in the NHS as a whole rose from £43.9bn per year in 2000, when the NHS Plan was launched, to £92.6bn. another measurement of efficiency is looking at numbers of early deaths from cancer, coronary heart disease and suicide; they continue to fall as services improve; over 98% of patients at Accident and Emergency (A&E) Departments are seen within 4 hours; and hospital waiting lists are lower than ever, with half a million fewer patients waiting since lists were at their peak.28

One key way to achieve the set objectives is to cut down NHS management’s costs by 45% over the next four years enabling them to free up investment for further improvements.28 Much has been achieved during the last five years of investment and reforms. For example, the significant investment in NHS staff, along with more flexible working, is facilitating healthcare professionals to take advantage of the freedom thus improving their commitment to the NHS. “NHS staff working flexibly and using improved technology are better able to respond to patients’ needs and changing expectations and are achieving improvements in quality and productivity across the system”.27

Since 1948, the NHS budget on average has risen over 4% in real terms each year; this is something they hope to resolve as the NHS will face a sustained and substantial financial constraint if it continues. They hope to avoid the financial crisis that happened in the NHS in the 1970’s. “The NHS hopes to release up to £20 billion of efficiency savings by 2014, which will be reinvested to support improvements in quality and outcomes”.15

Above all, the improvements and reforms continue to be originated on and underpin the core values and principles of the NHS: “equal access to care available at the point of need, regardless of ability to pay”.15

Equity

The NHS has overcome many inequality issues and allowed them to progress and improve their service. Examples are shown in NHS’s history and also with new legislations coming into place. Although there have been concerns about equitable provision and financing of health care since NHS inception, these have characterised the NHS till this very day. Since the publication of the Black report 29 the issue of equity has become one of the major issues in setting health policy objectives.30 Even though the objective of achieving a reduction in health inequalities is uncontroversial, the existing of set guidelines or having actual policies to achieve this is still indistinct. Further on there is no set path to follow if there is a cause of conflict between the goals of equity and efficiency. When policies and national objectives are set, too often the equity versus efficiency dilemma31 been ignored. This has lead to conflicting judgments in the progression of health policies.31

Another point in the NHS reforms history we can look at is the Blair era. The NHS reforms in the early to mid 2000s bestowed emphasis on hospitals to reduce waiting times and length of stay for patients of elective surgery. This form of pressure lead to harming equity practices; by imposing these new incentives to hospitals made them give less priority to select the less socio-economically disadvantaged patients. As would make it difficult for them achieve their objectives as these patients would stay longer and cost more to treat.33 This clearly shows that equity isn’t a major consideration when making decisions and taking on patients.

Having looked at these examples the NHS plans for 2010 shows that the government is aiming to provide and strive for equity in the NHS. They hope to strengthen the voice of patients and the public by arranging through the local authorities, and at national level a powerful new consumer champion: HealthWatch England for patients to have their concerns and also their ideas put forward and heard.15

Throughout the NHS’s history giving patient freedom allowing them to rate hospitals and clinical departments in accordance to the quality of the service being provided has been a major issue. For it to work both ways the government also require hospitals to be open about mistakes and always tell patients if something has gone wrong this will also ensure equity.

Overall the NHS seeks to guarantee that anyone and everyone regardless of their need or background will benefit from these arrangements and ensure equity is achieved.

Quality

The NHS has strived successfully and has become one of the most flourishing healthcare providers in the whole world. The standard of quality is next to world class service but there is still room for improvement.

Since 2000 when quality standards for the NHS were set it enabled the NHS to improve their overall quality and Inspection against essential quality standards. It aided the NHS in achieving aims and objectives as there were a set of guidelines the NHS could follow to ensure the quality aspect of the healthcare service was being attained. Since the very start of the NHS, emphasis was on improving quality and today the NHS is attaining this.

One of the very first reforms in the NHS with the Salmon Report, the aim was to improve quality. They got rid of matrons and replace them with nurse managers that would contribute to the overall management of the service thus improve quality within the NHS. Then in the 1974 Reorganisation where the NHS ensured policies were implemented and accountability was improved led to a service that followed set rules and achieved targets. Then in the 1990s the internal market came into place which led to a lot of competition in taking ownership of the hospitals and services but this improved quality and ensured patients requirements were being met and the quality standards achieved. The NHS Plan 2000 was a great achievement allowing the country to build new hospitals and improve the quality of care provided in England. Over the past 20 years they have improved the basic standards of the NHS. “In 2000, the NHS aimed to tackle major challenges they were facing. Since then the NHS has invested in 80,000 nurses and 38,000 more doctors, including 5,000 more GPs.34 they have also improve accessibility to services leading to overall improvement in healthcare outcomes: 238,000 lives have been saved in the last 11 years as a result of significant improvements in cancer and heart disease survival rates in particular.34

The NHS believes a more personalised service responding to each individuals needs can be achieved. The NHS hopes to be better equipped to keep patients healthy and capable of giving them more control and choices over the care and the service they provide.34

With the future of NHS in England, as stated above, the NHS Paper 2010 sets objectives to improve the quality of healthcare service in England. The NHS plan of 2010 aim to achieve a world-class healthcare service;15

The NHS will focus on outcomes and the standard of quality that conveys them. The new Government’s objectives are to reduce mortality and morbidity, increase safety, and improve patient experience and outcomes for all.

Institute a self-governing and accountable NHS Commissioning Board. The Board will have the responsibilities of ensuring health outcomes are being attained, they will also have the authority and control in allocating and accounting for NHS resources. They will focus on quality improvement and patient involvement and choice. They will have a precise duty to tackle inequalities in access to healthcare. They hope to gain more authority over the ministers and hope to become major decision makers.

Strengthen the role of the Care Quality Commission as an effective quality inspectorate across both health and social care. 15

Conclusion/ Summary

Overall the NHS since its inception has seen many reforms. The healthcare service in England since 1948 has become one of the world’s leading top quality services. It has improved every time a reform has taken place in terms of Efficiency, Equity and Quality.

From the first reform of the 1960’s of scientific management and the Salmon Report to the reforms of the NHS Plan 2000 objectives have been set and accomplished. After having many reforms and NHS being a successful healthcare provider the government seek to further the NHS for the 21st century. The future of the NHS looks bright as the new government having published their plans in the NHS White paper 2010. They hope to improve the overall quality of the healthcare service and aim to maintain constancy of purpose. The NHS White paper 2010 is a long-term plan for the NHS for the current and future governments to come. It sets out to make the NHS a coherent and stable healthcare service provider, enduring framework for quality and service improvement. They hope to change the views of the public and aim to get rid of the continuous debate on NHS structures and processes. Instead they hope to ensure that their priorities are to progress in health improvement for all. The reforms set in the new plans will be challenging and far-reaching, that will force cultural changes in the NHS, but these will have to take place in order to achieve their set targets. The government are setting out plans for managing change, including the transitional roles of strategic health authorities and primary care trusts. Although these plans have been set out many of the commitments made in this White Paper require primary legislation and are subject to Parliamentary approval.

Recommendations for the NHS to further enhance their quality of service could be by listening to patients needs by setting out questionnaires and gaining feedback and implementing them to the NHS strategies. The NHS could become owned by one set committee instead of having different forms of ownerships, this would allow them to gain more control of the service they provide. Also the management of the strategic health authorities could be run by clinicians who have experience of what the patients needs, having this experience would allow them to make more effective decisions in terms of efficiency, equity and quality.

In general the Healthcare service in England has been a success throughout its history in achieving its aims and objectives set out in every reform In terms of Efficiency, Equity and Quality. The future holds encouraging plans and aspire to carry on with the NHS striving as a world class healthcare provider.

Print Email Download Reference This Send to Kindle Reddit This

Share This Essay

To share this essay on Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, or Google+ just click on the buttons below:

Request Removal

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please click on the link below to request removal:

Request the removal of this essay.


More from UK Essays