Soufriere Marine Management Successful Conflict Resolution Engineering Essay
Soufriere Marine Management Area, Demonstrating Successful | |Conflict Resolution, Stakeholder involvement and Multi-zoning | |practices. | |Background: Soufriere is a rural town on the southwest coast of the | |island of St. Lucia (fig 1). This area is remarkable for the | |richness and diversity of its landscape and natural resources, | |including mountains, rainforest, rivers, active volcanoes and coral | |reefs (Wulf 2000). The area of coastline being described within this| |case study extends over 12 km, with Soufriere Bay at the centre and | |beaches and cliffs either side (Wulf 2000) (fig 3). The town of | |Soufriere lies within that bay. Most habitation and most of its | |economic activities are found along a narrow coastal strip | |(Pierre-Nathoniel 2003). The coastal area contains a narrow | |underwater shelf that supports the island's near-shore fisheries | |resources. Historically local fishermen have used pots/traps; | |seines; lines and gillnets as fishing methods (Pierre-Nathoniel | |2003). Before the Soufriere Marine Management Area was setup, young | |local fishermen had started using dynamite and other forms of | |harmful fishing. With the rapid evolution of the tourism industry, | |use of the coastal zone has expanded to include yachting, SCUBA | |diving, snorkeling and coastal sightseeing (Pierre-Nathoniel 2003). | |Locals now have to share the use of this limited coastal zone, which| |can lead to disputes. The first effort to protect Soufriere was led | |by the Department of Fisheries in 1986(Pierre-Nathoniel 2003). This | |was unsuccessful, due to the lack of resources to enforce management| |regimes and non-commitment of local stakeholders. It was followed by| |a more collaborative and participatory process over an eighteen | |month period, initiated through the combined efforts of the | |Department of Fisheries and two non-governmental organisations, the | |Caribbean Natural Resources Institute the Soufriere Regional | |Development Foundation (Pierre 2003). This led eventually the | |Soufriere Marine Management Area (SMMA) being formed in July | |1995(Pierre 2003). | |Issues analysis: In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the growing | |demand for scarce and fragile resources (Table 1) generated critical| |impacts and conflicts (Pierre 2003). The main environmental problems| |prior to the establishment of the SMMA were: degradation of coastal | |water quality, with direct implications for human health and for the| |protection of the reef ecosystem; depletion of near-shore fisheries | |resources; loss of the economic, scientific and recreational | |potential of coral reefs, particularly in the context of diving | |tourism; degradation of general environment quality, notably on or | |near beaches; pollution generated by solid waste disposal in ravines| |or directly in the sea (Wulf 2000). Problems of resource management | |manifested themselves in growing conflicts, conflicts between | |commercial dive operators and fishermen over the use of, and the | |perception of impact on, the coral reefs, conflicts between yachts | |and fishermen because of anchoring in fishing areas, conflicts | |between fishermen and authorities at both the local and national | |levels over the location of a jetty in a fishing priority area, | |conflicts between fishermen and hoteliers over the use of the | |beaches for commercial fishing or recreational, tourism oriented | |activities (Wulf 2000). Recently relevant institutions have been | |aware of these issues, and have initiated a number of programs and | |measures aimed at addressing them. These efforts included the legal | |establishment of Marine Reserves and Fishing Priority Areas, the | |provisions of support to the local Fishermen's Cooperative, the | |delivery of training and extension services, and enforcement of | |national regulations following the adoption of the new Fisheries Act| |in 1984 (Wulf 2000). Due to lack of funds and the fact that | |delimitation of reserves was based on resource distribution with too| |little thought for the socio-economic consequences for the fishers, | |conflicts continued to increase. | |Solutions: The Soufriere Marine Management Association formed under | |the Companies Act number 19 of 1996, oversees the overall management| |of the SMMA (DoF 2001). This association is guided by an 'Agreement | |to Manage the Soufriere Marine Management Area' (DoF 2001). The | |parties which entered into this agreement comprise the Board of | |Directors for the SMMA and include the following: ministry with | |responsibility for fisheries, ministry with responsibility for | |planning, development and the environment, ministry with | |responsibility for tourism, St Lucia air and sea ports authority, | |National Conservation Authority, St Lucia Dive Association, St Lucia| |Hotel and Tourism Association, Soufriere Fishermen's Cooperative, | |Soufriere Regional Development Foundation and The Soufriere Water | |Taxi Association (DoF 2001). The institutional and legal | |arrangements for the management of the SMMA are governed by the | |following idea: All parties retain individual management authority | |for areas and sectors under their jurisdiction (DoF 2001). The legal| |framework for the establishment and management of the SMMA and of | |the Fisheries Act, and ultimate responsibility, rests with the | |relevant Minister. As a result of the establishment of the SMMA, an | |eleven kilometre-length area of coastline was apportioned into | |several zones, catering to various users and uses (fig 2) | |(Pierre-Nathoniel 2003). These were- Marine Reserves: these areas | |are declared for the purpose of protecting the natural resources | |they contain, Fishing Priority Areas: these areas are declared for | |the purpose of maintaining and sustaining fishing activities, | |Multiple Use Areas: activities that may take place in these areas | |include fishing, diving, snorkelling and other recreational | |activities, Recreational Areas: these are terrestrial (beaches) and | |marine (swimming and snorkeling) areas, public access must be | |maintained, Yacht Mooring Sites: specific areas are designated to | |facilitate pleasure boats and yachts, without damaging bottom | |substrate, such as coral reefs and seagrass beds, a coral | |conservation fee is charged for the use of the moorings (Pierre | |2003). | |Lessons learned: One or more groups are accidentally or | |intentionally omitted from planning and negotiation. For example, | |several problems of enforcement of the initial agreement concerning | |marine reserves within the SMMA came from fishers who reside in | |nearby agricultural communities (and not in the coastal town of | |Soufriere as all regular fishers do) and who have the tradition of | |setting pots and diving for reef fishes seasonally, and very | |occasionally (Renard 2001). These individuals had not been | |identified in the early stages, and were thus not involved in the | |planning and decision-making process, which can cause of a lack of | |commitment (at best) or outright opposition (at worst) (Renard | |2001). | |Fair and equitable distribution of rights, responsibilities and | |benefits can be mitigated by others even when stakeholders and their| |interests are identified. In the case of the SMMA, there were eight | |fishermen who were systematically invited to all negotiation | |meetings and activities, and these individuals were assumed to | |represent all types of fishing (Renard 2001). However, and without | |this being noticed by the facilitators of the process, several of | |these fishers began to miss meetings, while the two leaders of the | |local Fisherman's Cooperative began to assume more responsibility | |and to act as the representatives for the whole fishing population | |(Renard 2001). In effect, what happened in this instance was a | |progressive return to the initial pattern of power relations within | |the fishing community, with the smallest of its members making very | |little contribution to formal negotiations (Renard 2001). |
We can help you to write your essay!
Figures, Tables, References[pic]Figure 1. A sketch map showing the position of St Lucia in the CaribbeanSea.(Pierre-Nathoniel, 2003)[pic]Figure 2. A sketch map showing the delineation of the 11km SMMA and the usedesignation of each area. (URL 1)[pic]Figure 3. A sketch map of the island of St Lucia, showing the area of thecoast designated as the MMA. (Wulf, 2000)Table 1. A table showing the resource use, authoritative organisations andstakeholders. (Renard 2001)[pic]
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please click on the link below to request removal: