Print Email Download Reference This Send to Kindle Reddit This
submit to reddit

Examining The Explanation Of Criminology Theory Criminology Essay

The second I heard the word criminology, the image of crooks came to mind. Then what is criminology theory? Take a lake for instance which water as of different streams such as anthropology, sociology, decision theory, psychology, law, which run into and unite. Criminology theory inquires the question why as well as what causes people to commit the crimes they do. Various issues may perhaps have influenced a person or a group of people to commit crimes. Issues such as dysfunctional families, poverty, illiteracy, sexual abuse can be contributing to emergence of criminals. Therefore, criminology is about considering the psychology of a person prior to, during and after he/she committed the crime.

Criminology in addition focuses on how crime and lawlessness affects dissimilar levels of people. Crime regardless where, how and when it is committed has penalties. While some crimes leave scars for life, on the victim’s lives. As the study of humans in their collective aspect, sociology is concerned with all group activities—economic, social, political, and religious. In dealing with crime in general, the importance has gradually shifted from punishment to rehabilitation.

Many criminologists view crime as one along with numerous types of deviance, regarding which there are conflicting theories. Numerous believe crime is a type of anomic behavior; others distinguish it as a more mindful response to social circumstances, to the break down in law enforcement or social order, and to the classifying certain behavior as deviant. While cultures differ in groups and principles, what is considered criminal might also vary, although most societies have preventive laws or customs.

Hereditary physical and psychological personas are usually out as independent causes of crime, but psychological states are thought to determine an individual's response to potent environmental influences. Some criminologists state that certain criminals are born into environments such as great poverty or discriminated-against minority groups that are likely to generate criminal behavior. Others dispute that given that only some persons yield to these influences, other stimuli ought to be at work.

Critical criminology depends on economic clarification of behavior and states that criminal conduct stems from social inequalities and economic. This theory states that crime from society cannot be removed within the capitalist system. Furthermore, the ruling class is able to influences the legal system, crime rates will not decline. Consequently, critical criminology does not center on individual criminals, but centers on overall social harm and social justice concerns including gender, class and race.

There are three dissimilar philosophical approaches to criminology. They are as follows:

The Classicists Approach: Classicists consider that each human has the ability to make choices and is accountable for his/her actions. Hence, if a human being makes the incorrect decision and breaks the law, he/she by default is to be punished. Having penalties in the criminal justice system will aid manage the number of crimes, such that citizens due to the fear of punishment will stay away from committing crimes. Positivists Approach: According to positivists, human beings react in the way they do because of certain internal and external pressures. These influences sometimes cause the people to lose control and take great decisions he/she usually would not have taken. Criminological theories are frequently corresponding, rather than standalone concepts. Theories such as rational choice, prevention, and opportunity theory can be employed in combination with one another to confront, build upon, and affirm or contradict each other. Criminal behavior is not essentially always simple and straightforward, and in numerous cases more than one theory can relate to a particular crime. In fact, the one-dimensional approach to explaining crime often tends to be inadequate because it ignores more factors than it takes into account (Barak). As a result, integrative or interdisciplinary theories of crime are coming into wider use (Barak). An understanding of the fundamental traditional theories, as well as a perspective on seeing them in combination, provides a more comprehensive approach to examining criminal behavior.

Rational choice theory is one of the most widely used theories in criminology. This theory assumes that people have the freedom to choose what behaviors they connect in, and that they make those choices based on rational results that take into consideration the potential pleasure or pain that the consequences of their actions will entail. Some theories in criminology consider that criminality is a position of individual socialization, how individuals have been influenced by their knowledge or relationships with family relationships, authority figures, peer groups, and socialization.  These are described as learning theories, and specifically social learning theories, because criminology by no means really embraced the psychological determinism inherent in the majority of learning psychologies.  In addition they are less alarmed for the content of what is learned like cultural deviance theories, and further concerned with clearing up the social course by which anyone, regardless of class, race or gender, would have the likelihood to become a criminal. 

  Learning is defined as behavior and knowledge that expand as a consequence of knowledge with the environment, as opposed to instincts, reaction, and genetic predispositions.  Associationism is the oldest learning theory; it is based on the thought that the mind arranges sensory occurrences in some way, and is called cognitive psychology.  Behaviorism is the second oldest learning theory; it is based on the design that the minds require a physical reaction by the body in order to systematize sensory associations.  There are two kinds of learning in behavioral psychology: the classical conditioning where stimuli build a given response without prior training; and operant conditioning where rewards and punishments are used to sustain given responses.   The Social learning theory that has the majority impact on criminology it is connected with the work of Bandura, a psychologist who invented the principles of stimulus control stimulus-to-stimulus support rather than stimulus-behavior reinforcement, outlined the stages of modeling attend. 

Social-control theory is an alternative of subculture theories because it highlights the achievement of values. Nevertheless, social-control theory situates the main question of criminology on its head. As the majority of theories attempt to give details why certain people or classes of people turn out to be criminals, social-control theory asks why nearly all people do not commit crimes. Social-control theory assumes that every person has a predisposition in the direction of criminal behavior. Whether or not a human being acts on those predispositions depends on whether he/she has binds to groups that convey ethics opposing crime, such as the family, the community, and organizations. People with such add-ons primarily embrace certain principles because they fear approval from these groups. Steadily, nonetheless, the principles are internalized and followed because of an idea that to do otherwise would be ethically wrong. People lacking these connections are not discouraged by risk of group sanction nor do they ultimately internalize legal norms, and therefore they are more expected to connect in criminal actions.

Conflict theory states that society is based on conflict between rival interest groups; for example, wealthy against poor, administration against manual labor, whites against minorities, women against men. These kind of dog-eat-dog theories also have their foundation in the 1960s and 1970s, and are distinguished by the study of power and powerlessness. Karl Marx’s conflict theory claims that crime is predictable in capitalist societies, as invariably certain groups will become marginalized and imbalanced. In looking for equality, members of these groups may frequently turn to crime in order to gain the material wealth that apparently brings fairness in capitalist economic states. Those who control the productive property of any society land, factories, and equipment use their economic influence to dominate other spheres culture, education, politics, and surely the criminal justice system. There may be laws that assist everybody, but mostly "the general interest" is a fiction that covers up class interest.

Several theories in criminology consider that criminality is a function of human being socialization, how individuals have been predisposed by their occurrences or associations with family, peer groups, authority figures, and additional means of socialization. These are called learning theories, and specifically social learning theories, because criminology by no means actually embraced the psychological determinism natural in most learning psychologies.

Criminology began in the 1800 century while social reformers began to inquire the use of punishment for revenge rather than prevention and reform. In the 1900 century, scientific technique started to be applied to the study of crime. Nowadays criminologists usually use figures, case histories, official records, and sociological field techniques to study criminals and criminal actions, including the rates and sorts of crime within regions.

Crime rates, although regularly distorted by the political or social agenda of those recording and reporting them, lean to vary with social trends, increasing in times of depression, following wars, and in other time of disorganization. In the United States organized crime became major during prohibition. Within cities, poverty areas contained the top rates of reported crime, particularly between young people. One major category that was relatively disregarded in anticipation of current decades is that of white-collar crime, property crimes committed by people of fairly elevated social class in the course of their business careers.

Print Email Download Reference This Send to Kindle Reddit This

Share This Essay

To share this essay on Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, or Google+ just click on the buttons below:

Request Removal

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please click on the link below to request removal:

Request the removal of this essay.


More from UK Essays