Multiculturalism Society Change
Multiculturalism
Multiculturalism: Individual Perception of Humanity in Promoting Change in a Diverse Society
Abstract
Understanding other cultural values, beliefs, and attitudes, in an era where public policy and discrimination play a major role in adaptation of other values and systems. Amalgamation of cultural differences is a focal point in this article, with emphasis on inclusion. Attitudes from policy makers and the public perspectives recognize diversity exists in today's society and implement positive changes. The reality of multiculturalism in the United States exists and continues its growth in population. The challenge becomes individual response to multiculturalism, and the desire to understand a society filled not simply with diverse cultures, nevertheless with human beings deserving of respect and the right to prosper.
Literature Review
Anthropological and historical views of cultural relativism presented by (Ulin, 2007) are research-based approach to diversity and critical thinking. Representing his perspective of a modern day approach of culture, from a political and social viewpoint, (Ulin, 2007) addresses the social, political, and ethical aspects of cultural relativisms regarding inequalities. The main theme of this theory implies an appreciator for differing cultural meaning of their social world and practices. Communication is a valid factor of discrimination and biases, simply due to lack of understanding, even though the meanings are similar. Frequently, the usage of communication
as being the universal language, as a society this concept seems to have dissipated. This concept of universality is an argument of relativism or perhaps interpretation of cultural meaning.
Geertz, (1973) though not a recent publication points out the need for a systemic view of a divers culture one that incorporates the disciplines of “biological, psychological sociological” (Geertz, 1973, p. 44) factors in to the equation differing thoughts and patterns of other cultures. This philosophical view of decades of social and cultural issues and relationships is not a new theory, a change perhaps simplification and revitalization of modern philosophy. Promoting change in a self-absorbed society represents open-mindedness in terms of cultural differences, even the issue of immigrants, and a factual growing culture in the United States. The rationale of human nature is to resist change, therefore it is conceivable adjusting to multicultural diversity takes time, and inclusion takes effort, understanding, and communication.
Frequently lack of understanding other cultural languages, beliefs, rituals an heritage, becomes the obstacle of inclusion. Naylor, (1997) summarizes orientation of diversity involves individual understanding and experiences and interaction with diverse cultures. For example, family morals, values, and attitudes towards persons from other cultures are a crucial entity in terms of generational attitudes towards persons of race, color, and religious beliefs. Negativity and judgmental beliefs handed down from generations, is significant to the conflicts that occur in the United States. Attitudes such as this is our country we are “Americans” this is our heritage, other persons of cultural differences invade our territory utilize our socioeconomic resources. Perhaps self-evaluation of heritage is questionable in terms of our own heritage. For example, the heritage of my background is a multiplex value and mixture of French, Cajun, and Cherokee, originally my decedents came from France and Canada, not exactly Americana. Our decedents all migrated to this country called America, so quickly to forget heritage and judge others, when conceivably the possibility that the majority of the population are all decedents of immigrants a unique culture.
In essence, culture is a body of people, evaluating behaviors, in an environment that tends to be a continuum of complexities of social issues and distinctive ideas of diversity (Naylor, 1997). In addition, consideration of individual rights of all people pertains to the freedom of speech, Binderup, (2007) refers to the controversial issues
References
Ulin, R. C. (2007). revisiting Cultural Relativisim: Old Prospects for a New Cultural Critique. Anthropological Quarterly, 80(3), 803-819.
Binderup, L. (2007). Global Freedom of Speech. Trames, 11(4), 403-418.
Naylor, L. L. (1997). Cultural Diversity in the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group Inc.
We provide a professional essay writing service that thousands of our customers use as an effective way of improving their grades, improving their research and saving them lots of time.
